Monthly Archives: January 2016

6

George Borjas’ new blog: gborjas.org Will respond to critics of his forthcoming book, w/ is skeptical of benefits of mass immig.

| 9 years ago on Twitter

87 8 Theories in Search of an Establishment

Eight (8) theories on the heavily advertised embrace of Trump over Cruz by the disembodied GOP “establishment”:

1. They actually want to kill off Trump. The Establishment  is not stupid. It knows voters hate it. Its embrace of Trump could be the kiss of death. Problem: Too obvious.

2. They actually want to kill off Cruz: They despise Cruz both on characterological and institutional grounds, as described here and here. They are not faking their preference for Trump. Problem: Are they dumb enough to think they have the power to derail Cruz in this political climate?

3. They actually want to kill off Rubio to promote Jeb!: By seeming to embrace Trump, they’re signalling they no longer have faith in former favorite Marco Rubio’s viability, as MSNBC’s Chris Hayes tweeted. But the Trump embrace is a fake! Once Rubio and Cruz have been derailed, the Establishment lane will be wide open for Jeb!, who’ll win in a head-to-head with Trump. Problem: Will Beltway pissing on Cruz really be interpreted as a devastating dis of Rubio? Seems a little hot takey.  [Indeed, Hayes’ tweet may have been a joke.] And who, exactly, cares if the DC Establishment loses faith in Rubio? Some funders, maybe. Not voters, you’d think.

4. They’re actually trying to help McConnell: Even if they don’t think they can derail Cruz, they’ll get points with the Senate Majority Leader for trying to discipline an obnoxious freshman who caused him trouble and called him a liar. And if you’re a K St. lobbyist it may be more important to get Sen. McConnell on your side than to get your first choice into the White House.

5. It’s all about immigration. They’re actually still trying to pass amnesty: They realize the best way to get a legalization bill isn’t to elect an amnesty supporter like Rubio and then ram it through with the help of the MSM — that opportunity has passed, thanks to voters. No, their best hope now is to let the voters elect a vocal opponent of legalization (Trump) and then “coach” him into accepting legalization. Problem: Wishful thinking? Trump seems heavily invested in immigration control. Maybe there is an “Enforcement First” deal that could be cut, with Trump bludgeoning Dems into going along. But the GOP Establishment has never embraced it before.

6. They just want to win: They recognize Trump’s ability to reach out to new groups of general election voters, including African Americans. Problem: Why didn’t they realize this seven months ago?

7. They’re just bowing to the inevitable: Lobbyists are adaptive. Like it or not, Trump is going to win. Maybe if they curry favor with him now …  Problem: Still seems a little early for this. There’ll be plenty of time after New Hampshire or South Carolina.

8. They are patriots: After careful thought, they’ve concluded that whatever his chances, Trump will make a better president. Problem: Yeah, right.

I favor #5, of course, which is why I stuck it in. You? …

11

Stab-in-the-Back Theory forming: It was evil @r2rusa, not Gangof8 amnesty betrayal, that did in our Golden Boy Marco tws.io/1UkWNWj

| 9 years ago on Twitter

20

I’d add Cruz to that list. Hillary will try too, but will be more GOP resistance (as with Obama) twitter.com/kausmickey/sta…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

41

No. Most GOP candiates (Rubio/Jeb/Kasich/Christie) wld immediately try 2 push thru amnesty bill (w/ Ryan) if elected twitter.com/JamesInOhio/st…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

40

And when a politician *doesn’t* pander & sticks to his view the pros call him “tone-deaf.” OK! twitter.com/DavidMDrucker/…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

34

You’d think C Wallace wld ask Rubio abt Gangof8 when discussing his “biggest legis. accomplishment.” You’d be wrong foxnews.com/transcript/201…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

37

Paradigm: EVERYTHING in @WSJ on ’16 is attempt 2 dance around their open borders advocacy. So far no discordant data twitter.com/LeeAnnMcGinnis…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

37

My crude litmus test 4 whether @FoxNews is being fair 2 Trump is whether they have Coulter on. Answer: Not recently nyti.ms/1UjwC2m

| 9 years ago on Twitter

37

Are they suggesting that surging illegal migration from Central Am is bringing diseases? Yes. (Why wouldn’t it?) twitter.com/BreitbartTexas…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

1

Oblivious Rich Dept.: I’m anti-anti-Trump, but this anti-Trump blog item’s kind of brilliant. Better than anything in the National Review‘s recent stunt issue. And … kicker … it’s written by someone who works at the National Review.  … It’s almost as if the big boys don’t notice the little people!

9

Of course if Cruz or Rubio go after, say, Ex-Im Bank, that’s *good* for K St–lobbyists will get paid to defend it twitter.com/BillKristol/st…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

25

DC comes to standstill as half of Nation’s Capital contemplates getting on the Bloomberg gravy train …

| 9 years ago on Twitter

2

Contains one of the greatest arbitrary “comes at a time” grafs I’ve seen. Don’t think he was talking gun control … twitter.com/RyanLizza/stat…

| 9 years ago on Twitter