48
That’s the thing w/ Schumer: 1st he cons U. Then he damages U by telling @NYT how he conned U. Did it w/ Christie nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/…
Mickey Kaus
Kausfiles
That’s the thing w/ Schumer: 1st he cons U. Then he damages U by telling @NYT how he conned U. Did it w/ Christie nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/…
@kausmickey he wants to take Rubio out, because he thinks Trump nom will destroy GOP?
@kausmickey @NYT Page not found?
@kausmickey If so, Schumer must believe: a) Rubio wld be a formidable gen elex contender, and b) Trump wld be less so. #3rdTimestheCharm
@kausmickey nice @NYT made article disappear
@kausmickey @NYT Yup, Dems spotted Rubio as rising star, a threat. So they lured him in, muddied him real good via his earnestness, ambition
@kausmickey @NYT ?Murdoch/Rubio/FOX/Donors/Others-conspire?-2 run Rubio 3rd party-So Nobody gets 270 Electorals=House picks Pres=Pres Rubio?
@kausmickey @NYT SCHUMER IS A CROOK. HE NEEDS TO BE UNDER CLOSE WATCH FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS!
The trouble is an plan to split up the GOP is more likely to Help the DEMs win than. For this scenario to work, Trump would have to win a number of Blue State to keep the Dems from Sweeping while Rubio would have red States he doesn’t even seem to win primaries for.