Monthly Archives: April 2016

3

“Tactical mistake.” Epstein-related settlement is maybe less a vindication of Dershowitz than he makes it out to be abovethelaw.com/wp-content/upl…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

35

What would you do with $400,000 worth of Mark Levin’s book anyway? Build a house with them? …

| 9 years ago on Twitter

22

Trounced among party insiders, who hate him. Wld better “organization” fix this problem? Voters still bind ballot #1 twitter.com/politico/statu…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

46

I’m not saying trust him. I’m saying see if his work checks out. He claims to have some docs, etc. twitter.com/E__Strobel/sta…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

4

Old-style politicians–who don’t want anyone mad at them–having trouble with mad-around-the-clock Internet era? twitter.com/StevenJDuffiel…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

15

Is she victim? “Pop culture icon”? Is she Ailes’ Galatea whom he then destroyed? [Sorry that last is not in piece] nyp.st/1qyHEbd

| 9 years ago on Twitter

44 Harmonic Convergence of Paranoia, Part 7

The Pecker Solution: Commentators who say Paul Ryan can’t steal the GOP nomination in Cleveland point to the intensity of feeling among Cruz and Trump supporters — any attempt to wrest away the prize would be seen as unfair and undemocratic, splitting the party, etc. But commentators too often lack a robust paranoid imagination. What about this scenario: Trump fails to win on the first ballot. Pre-planted establishment delegates quickly abandon him. Cruz takes the lead by the third ballot. But suddenly something appears that makes a Cruz choice impossible–something that forces him out of the race as surely as if he’d been vaporized by a laser from space. The convention has no choice but to turn to a new face … Cue Ryan, who has been transparently plotting for just such an eventuality.

What might that vaporizing something be? One obvious possibility currently lurks in the undernews: the (unproven, and very possibly untrue) Cruz adultery scandal being promoted by (among other places) the National Enquirer. Conservatives suspect the liberal MSM is slow-walking its inquiries into this seedy allegation until the general election, at which point (if Cruz is on the ticket) the muck will descend on him. But what if it’s the GOP Establishment that is holding back on the story– holding back until the convention, when a clean takeout of Cruz will open the door for Ryan (something that wouldn’ have been the case during the campaign, or during the first ballot, when a campaign-ending Cruz scandal would simply usher in Trump). Seedy sex scandals have broken during conventions before.  Just thinking out loud here.

Never underestimate the undernews. …

21

A “higher standard”: @SpeakerRyan spends hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to promote @SpeakerRyanbhttp://bit.ly/23fWPar

| 9 years ago on Twitter

9

Shldn’t hold harmless ablebodied who don’t work (welfare). Trade hurts poorest fulltime workers. Undermines social = twitter.com/JamesVSmithIV/…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

37

I would put this unproven undernews in the John Edwards category of scoops the MSM really really doesn’t want to get twitter.com/jashsf/status/…

| 9 years ago on Twitter

12

Free trade : Compensating losers :: War : Nation-building. People always assume the latter is easier than it is econ.st/21Ug5Ex

| 9 years ago on Twitter