10
Has now been changed. 1) Still omits Thomas–stunningly disingenuous 2) Still amazingly sloppy 4 Greenhouse. Sup. C… twitter.com/i/web/status/7…
Has now been changed. 1) Still omits Thomas–stunningly disingenuous 2) Still amazingly sloppy 4 Greenhouse. Sup. C… twitter.com/i/web/status/7…
@kausmickey @MikeSacksEsq But same Republicans who now say Ds shouldn’t make an ideological change to the court had no problem with Thomas
Ok, nice nitpick, but saying “stunningly disingenuous” suggests that you think the overall argument is wrong and deceptive. Look at the facts. Thomas is sitting on the court, Garland (whom most would consider a more moderate, “consensus” selection) is not even getting a hearing. U being disingenuous much Kaus?
@kausmickey Not forgotten. It’s conscious manipulation – assuming (a la #Clintons) I WILL get away with it – no consequences even if caught.
@kausmickey She sucks.