|
The Perfect Campaign
All e-mail all the time. |
|||
Posted Thursday, March 16, 2000 Many people dread the distinct possibility of a non-stop presidential campaign between now and November. But the two candidates, mindful of the recent presidents who took time off from vigorous campaigning in the spring--that would be President Dukakis and President Dole--seem intent on using every available minute to poke and jab. Luckily, modern technology has come to the rescue. This past week, Gore and Bush traded ploys and charges via electronic mail, a practice that, as it comes to replace more conventional campaigning, has several obvious advantages: We don't have to actually see the candidates: Neither Gore nor Bush wear well on repeated viewing. Gore, even the improved version, is stilted and condescending and ... well, there's just something wrong. Bush seems defensive, small, and amazingly inarticulate. But an all-e-mail campaign allows voters to abstract from the candidates' annoying personal qualities and focus on what they have to say. Editing: Gore's initiale-mail missive of Tuesday and Bush's response were clear, pointed, substantive, and occasionally even funny. Gore made a powerful point about the way stopping the "ad war arms race" might change politics; Bush effectively raised the issue of whether Gore had violated existing campaign laws, and joked that "[T]his Internet of yours is a wonderful invention." There is a reason these salvos were both more articulate and more entertaining than anything said on the stump by Gore and Bush. They didn't write them. People who are articulate and entertaining wrote them. Or, if the candidates wrote them, their thoughts were then edited to remove Bushian infelicities of grammar and legalisms like "no controlling legal authority." It's low profile: Who wants the campaign to take up all our media space? Not the networks, apparently, who seem to believe that politics equals low ratings. A nice little e-mail campaign, bubbling along on the Web and the inner pages of the papers, seems about what the public can bear--at least until the fall. It's cheap: A conventional traveling campaign costs a lot of money--planes, advance men, hotel rooms, etc. So does a TV ad. An e-mail, in contrast, costs a few cents. Candidates conserve money and therefore have to raise less of it from insidious special interests. It's easy on reporters: Why traipse to a staged photo op in some remote location when you can just download the day's spiel from the Net? An all-e-mail campaign would free America's greatest journalistic minds to do what they want to do and do best, which is go drinking in bars with campaign strategists. Perhaps John McCain didn't go far enough. Instead of talking about banning soft money and independent "issue" ads, he should have called for all campaigning before Labor Day to be conducted exclusively via e-mail and the Web. The Straight Chat Express! Of course, if McCain were still in the race, the prospect of a campaign where you didn't have to actually see and hear the candidates wouldn't be nearly as appealing. New E-mail service: Sign up, using the ListBot gizmo below, and you will be notified by e-mail whenever there's a new item on kausfiles.com. [Note: this service is free. You'll be asked a couple of demographic questions; if you find them annoying just leave them unanswered.] | ||||
|
Recently archived:
No Justice, No Paez
The LAT and 'judicial activism.'
Kausfiles Battles for the Vital Center!
Why Bush has plenty of time to reposition himself.
Clean Sheets
The case for selling the Lincoln Bedroom.
Don't Push It, Hillary
Plus: kausfiles moves its cheese!
Faster Politics
Why 'momentum' ain't what it used to be.
Why I Hate Exit Polls
Do they prove Bradley's heart scare doomed him?
NYT Reader Alert!
Giuliani vs. the non-profits.
Jeffrey Toobin, Chicken!
Fifth of a series.
Hillary's Shocking Truth
Plus: the Nissan Cojones Watch.
Hit Poems
A kausfiles contest.
Five Easy McCain Pieces
Plus hot Toobin docs!
Gore's Press Problem
Plus: How he blew his chance for a New Hampshire knockout.
Bush Knows What "Regatta" Means
Bradley's SATS; the media's moodswing; the neolibs' nightmare.
Those Strange Iowa Results
What's the secretive VNS up to?
Jeffrey Toobin, Hypocrite, Part III!
How dare Isikoff write a book, says Toobin in his book.
Drop the Big One
Plus more Toobin sleaze, special travel bonus.
Not Gotcha
Why Gore's gay flip was a genuine gaffe.
Pay Up, Shrum!
Litmus test flip-flop smoking gun.
Jeffrey Toobin, Hypocrite
'Tawdry voyeurism,' anyone?
Cuomo Family Values
Did Mario raise his son to be Hillary's Boy?
DeParle Gets Half the Story
The NYT doesn't tell us what we need to know about Milwaukee's poor.
Et tu, TNR?
Nobody's being fair to the poor House Republicans.
Dumb and Dumber!
Two NYT embarrassments in one day.
Bill Clinton Wants You on Welfare!
Is this the dole administration after all?
The Pornographer Who Didn't Bark
Why wouldn't Flynt bust Newt?
Yes, There Are Easy Answers!
The NYT and WaPo find a quick fix for affirmative action.
Who Stole Nissan's Cojones?
Jerry Hirshberg'a got a lot of ... chutzpah!
Doesn't Anyone Want to Be Famous?
The political opportunity of a lifetime.
Wolf Cries Wolf
Naomi goes "oppo" without the research.
The Ending of the Black
Underclass, Part XVIII
African-American welfare receipt falls to new low.
Righteous Centrist
Bradley's un-sweeping anti-poverty plan.
Just Buzz Me!
Synergy City! Harvey Weinstein plans a TV show based on Talk.
Is Daniel Patrick Moynihan the
Devil? A review of the evidence to date.
Harvey Scores Again! An
exciting new Talk contest.
Is It Over? Clinton's Pathetic
Second Term Revealing the one Big Thing he still might accomplish.
Maybe Bush Didn't Snort
Coke -- Maybe He Dropped Acid! One solution to the Bush drug mystery.
George Bush, Drug Pioneer?
Bush's pharmacological time-line seems a little ... out of the mainstream.
Will Tina Fire Lucinda? Talk and truth.
Copyright 2000 Mickey Kaus.
|